parburypolitica
Tuesday, January 02, 2007
  The sex issue
Stroppyblog is less than impressed by the religious bigots of northern ireland and their opposition to new equality laws for gays and lesbians. I think when I see them protesting on the TV that they look so antiquated. Perhaps they need a shag or perhaps a better shag. If they had a more tolerant and pluralist view of sexuality then they would have been more interesting in shagging each other than killing each other over recent decades.

She also has a go at Ruth Kelly who is the minister responisble for equalities. RK we are lead to believe is a strong roman catholic, nothing wrong in that. People should have the right to freedom of religion. The thing is she gives the impression of being more interested in the RC chuch than she does in her equalites brief. No doubt the line will be trotted out that ministers have a right to a private personal faith and indeed they do.

It's just when Winston Churchill was fighting WWII I bet he didn't have a private opinion that it wouldn't be to bad if Germany actually won the war. The thing this reminds me of is Alan Clarke as a junior Tory employment minister reading out in parliament what his civil servants have prepared for him on equality for women. I understand it was not the most convincing performance of his life. Ministers tend to be more effective if they actually believe in what they are doing. So we want to see some conviction from the secreatry of state.

My view is that the state or indeed religious groups are not the best people to say who and how we should shag as we are perfectly capable of deciding that for ourselves.
 
Comments:
The fact Ruth Kelly is religious shouldn't have an impact on her political career but it obviously does as she cannot bring herself to support anti-discrimination legislation for lesbians and gay men. Her silence says a hell of a lot about her.........

"My view is that the state or indeed religious groups are not the best people to say who and how we should shag as we are perfectly capable of deciding that for ourselves".

Totally agree!
 
These laws are being imposed under direct rule law by Peter Hain. They have been put on ice for the rest of the UK because of "fears over the effect on children". The laws have nothing to do with who you shag. I can understand people's irritation at being the UK's test case.

Are you seriously equating protesting with sexual frustration?
 
Are you seriously equating protesting with sexual frustration?

No but after a shag how often do you feel like going campaigning to deny others the same thing.?
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

Enter your email address below to subscribe to Parburypolitica!


powered by Bloglet





Jon Cruddas for Deputy Leader


The delectable Kerron Cross


Adele


Newer Labour


Fair Deal Phil


Luke Akehurst


Michael Meacher MP


ThaLondonDiaries


Dirty Leftie


Hamer Shawcross


Skipper


Omar Salem


Chris Paul

Locations of visitors to this page
Add to Technorati Favorites


ARCHIVES
July 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / May 2007 / June 2007 / July 2007 / August 2007 / September 2007 /

Powered by Blogger