parburypolitica
Sunday, January 21, 2007
  No sex please we're asexuals
There was a story in a student newspaper I was reading about someone who complained that they had been asked to leave a meeting of a LGBT society (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transexual). Why because they were not any of the above sexual orientations. This person considered themselves to be asexual, that is to not have sexual attraction to other people. You can find out more about it here

I'm sure that it must be an embarrasing experience for the person concerned but I think it is a bit wrong headed to go to the media and complain. Why? Because why on earth would an asexual person want to join a society whose whole reason for being is sex? That I would have thought would be the last place that they would want to be. I also think that it is acceptable that societies can choose to be associations for like minded people. So Christian Unions don't have to admit Satanists, Labour Clubs don't have to admit Conservatives. Is there a case that such a right be limited? I think there is as I wouldn't want to see a civil society divided along racial lines for instance but in this case I have a better solution.

Don't be offended set up an asexual group instead. Why be fifth among equals when you can have a society just for the glorification of asexuals. There could be a small problem in that most student unions require societies to have 20 members before becoming a proper recognised society and finding 20 asexual students aint going to be easy.
 
Comments:
Labour clubs do have to admit conservatives. It is part of the unions equal opportunities policy.
 
That is just absurd. But I suppose it does give the opportunity to go and disrupt conservative future from its more extreme policy oppositions. Every cloud and all that. Are they still in favour of hanging Nelson Mandela or have they droped it?
 
Most of the mthese Days are doing a major NOLS and going for Cameronism.

You shouldn't read student Direct Will. Well, not anymore...
 
I heard they took the sex column out while they shove it down the pan generally.
 
Asexual seeking inspiration perhaps? Not comfortable in 99 Het Socs offered by the SU. Tries one that is less specific. A bit less specific. If Gaysoc has to let in Hets then surely they must let in 'A' listers? Not to mention apolitical fibbers. Whoops.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

Enter your email address below to subscribe to Parburypolitica!


powered by Bloglet





Jon Cruddas for Deputy Leader


The delectable Kerron Cross


Adele


Newer Labour


Fair Deal Phil


Luke Akehurst


Michael Meacher MP


ThaLondonDiaries


Dirty Leftie


Hamer Shawcross


Skipper


Omar Salem


Chris Paul

Locations of visitors to this page
Add to Technorati Favorites


ARCHIVES
July 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / May 2007 / June 2007 / July 2007 / August 2007 / September 2007 /

Powered by Blogger